RF-NonStick
The Best Medically Approved Ceramic Coating
RF Kinetics Inc. is proud to introduce our newest breakthrough technology: The RFK-NonStick all ceramic coating for electro-surgical electrodes. Non-stick coatings are extremely valuable for electro-surgical products. They improve performance in RF energy transfer, reduce eschar buildup, and eliminate time wasted on frequent cleaning of non-coated electrodes.
Our exciting new non-stick coating has the following advantages:
Durability and Resistance: The RFK-NonStick coating is designed to withstand repeated use and sterilization, including steam autoclaving. It is scratch-resistant and hard enough to prevent peeling, unlike silicone rubber coatings.
Biocompatibility: The RFK-NonStick coating is entirely non-toxic and biocompatible, ensuring safety for patients and clinicians alike. It does not contain any PTFE or related materials that may be harmful to health.
Performance: Our non-stick coating enhances RF energy transfer and reduces eschar buildup, thereby improving the performance of electro-surgical products.
Convenience: RFK-NonStick eliminates the need for frequent cleaning of non-coated electrodes, saving time and effort for clinicians. Additionally, the coating does not emit fumes, making it a safer option for electro-surgical procedures.
Cost-Effective: Despite its many advantages, RFK-NonStick is competitively cost-effective, making it an affordable solution for improving the quality of electro-surgical procedures.
In conclusion, RFK-NonStick all-ceramic coating for electro-surgical electrodes is a groundbreaking technology that offers unparalleled advantages. With its durability, biocompatibility, improved performance, convenience, and cost-effectiveness, RFK-NonStick is set to revolutionize the field of electro-surgery.
SIDE-BY-SIDE after-use COmparison of RF-nonstick versus competitor’s nonstick
A blade that is coated with RF-NonStick (left) and a blade that is coated with a competitor’s coating were utilized during a specific procedure, and the results of this comparison are clearly depicted in the images presented below. These visuals highlight the differences observed between the two coatings in practical application.